|
supercentral                                              outerspace cities emily grenader hipzilla bridgette auger oakbrook pictures interstate 8 iiiiiiiiii tasha lutek dorian pimpernel designing crime xyz affair (v.1, v.2, v.3, v.4, v.5, v.6) (Ww, Xx, Yy, Zz) |
CONCORDANCE
Amazon.com, a website I make some effort to avoid, has the most incredible feature. In some ways, it's a postmodern, computer-generated book review and synopsis. In another sense, it's chaos theory composing refrigerator magnet poetry. All in all, it's the most startling, apt, and incisive list of words that come in alphabetical order. Ladies and gentlemen: "concordance." I will only briefly explain the concept before allowing the constructions to display their own majesty. "Concordance" is defined by Microsoft Word as "n. 1. similarity or agreement between two or more things 2) an index of words, for example, of all the words contained in a single work, or in the combined works of an author, or in any body or bank of text, arranged in alphabetical order." One draws the conclusion: of course. Concordance, it would seem, is the bottom principle of both physics and metaphysics; do not forget to mention that it is also arbitrary and neurotic. A more lucid definition might also explain that a concordance is not meant to signify meaning—it's a statistical measure, a piece of neutral data. Yet the strangely human relevance a concordance bears to its host text is undeniable, once viewed. As James Marcus once said of Ulysses, "is also compulsively readable... as long as you’re willing to be buffeted, tickled, challenged, and (occasionally) vexed." His advice could not hold more true. I present for you now:
again   
always   
arms   
asked   
away   
behind   
bit   
black   
bloom
   
call   
came
   
come
   
course
   
day
   
dedalus
   
door
   
down
   
ever
   
eyes
   
face
   
father
   
fellow
   
first
   
get
   
girl
   
give
   
go
   
god
   
going
   
good
   
got
   
hand
   
hat
   
head
   
heart
   
high
   
himself
   
house
   
joe
   
john
   
know
   
last
   
left
   
let
   
life
   
little
   
long
   
look
   
lord
   
love
   
man
   
men
   
might
   
mother
   
mr
   
mulligan
   
must
   
name
   
new
   
night
   
now
   
old
   
own
   
place
   
poor
   
put
   
right
   
round
   
saw
   
say
   
see
   
sir
   
something
   
stephen
   
still
   
street
   
take
   
tell
   
thing
   
think
   
though
   
thought
   
three
   
time
   
told
   
took
   
two
   
voice
   
want
   
water
   
went
   
white
   
wife
   
without
   
woman
   
words
   
world
   
years
   
yes
   
young
And the imposing, nuclear-white ending—a list of barely plausible finitude! The circularity of this concordance, embodied by the explosive "again"s and "yes"es, evokes not only Joyce's habitual, almost compulsive circularity, but a particular passage that in many ways has come to define the apocalyptic hilarity of Joyce's later and more important writing:
     (1st page, at the book's reemerging terminus)
     (last page, at the book's distant greeting)
Dangerously, the concordance not only understands the book—it subsumes it. They reverse roles, and the full text becomes an explanation, a spinning-out of implications buried in its own index. This is only dangerous, however, in that it presents the possibility of something wondrous and new. The concordance chants: “bloom call came come course day”. The mind sharpens it to a razor point: “Bloom call came; come course day.” It is Molly's gentle nagging (one hears her, leaning voluptuously out a window), followed by a breathtakingly simple sunrise. The concordance, Joyce's fertile estrangement from God: “look lord, love men.” The concordance; profound meditations on bonds between people and books in an era of dead faith, transformed without hesitation back into a brow quivering with self-amusement: “though thought three time, told took two voice. Want water.” And then, ineluctably, Molly's eruptive, repressed sexuality in the book's heaving final breaths:
|